[jan-petr]

Updated the roadmap link for ASL pipeline projects and modified the publication reference for ISMRM abstract 2021.

[oliverchampion]

Two overarching things:
1: there is a merge conflict that needs resolving --> this needs fixing

2: should we standardize the way we add literature to the website? Now it is a little chaotic (title first, or authors first. All authors, or et al. hyperlink as DOI, or elsewhere). --> this is more of a discussion and can be worked through in a second PR (issue?)

I suggest for ISMRM abstratcs to stick to what I did earlier:
https://osipi.github.io/ismrmabstracts/

For papers I suggest
hyperlinked Title first --> It is the most important info and the hyperlink makes it stand out
Then (possibly) all authors, although I would be okay with ommitting authors for readability; similar to abstracts
Journal
year and other numbers

[jan-petr]

Two overarching things: 1: there is a merge conflict that needs resolving --> this needs fixing

2: should we standardize the way we add literature to the website? Now it is a little chaotic (title first, or authors first. All authors, or et al. hyperlink as DOI, or elsewhere). --> this is more of a discussion and can be worked through in a second PR (issue?)

I suggest for ISMRM abstratcs to stick to what I did earlier: https://osipi.github.io/ismrmabstracts/

For papers I suggest hyperlinked Title first --> It is the most important info and the hyperlink makes it stand out Then (possibly) all authors, although I would be okay with ommitting authors for readability; similar to abstracts Journal year and other numbers

1. Yes, likely both commits editing TF6.1 publications. I'll solve this during the merge process.

2. Good point and we should have this reasonably similar. I'm fine with any type of formatting.

3. I agree that what you did in https://osipi.github.io/ismrmabstracts/ looks way better then in TFs. So lets adopt that style.

4. For papers, I agree what you say. Though I would prefer to keep at least the first author - that's what is often visible in journals and that's how many people identify a paper.

[oliverchampion]

Happy for you to resolve (and then you or I can merge). Once done, I will harmonize references :)

[oliverchampion]

Loks good