Repository navigation
GH-55366: [Dev][Release] Fix USE_CONDA=1 verification for GLib and Ruby on macOS and update docs - #55367
Draft
tadeja wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
GH-55366: [Dev][Release] Fix USE_CONDA=1 verification for GLib and Ruby on macOS and update docs#55367tadeja wants to merge 1 commit into
tadeja wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
|
github-actions
Bot
added
Component: Documentation
awaiting committer review
Member
Author
|
@github-actions crossbow submit preview-docs |
|
Revision: 6e6eb89 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-703925e9eb
|
Member
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
See #55366
What changes are included in this PR?
ruby -rbundler/setupinstead ofbundle exec rubypkg-configwhenUSE_CONDA=1release_verification.rstAre these changes tested?
Yes, on macOS for now
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
Was AI used for this PR?
PR code and description written by:
Reviewed before submission by: