Skip to content

24.0/main Health Check, please don't merge this! - #14028

Draft
weizhouapache wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
healthcheck-main
Draft

weizhouapache wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
healthcheck-main

Conversation

@weizhouapache

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

This is a dummy PR to kick smoketests on 24.0/main branch.

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@weizhouapache weizhouapache added this to the 24.0.0 milestone Sep 1, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 19.91%. Comparing base (ed1db53) to head (887012c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #14028      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     19.91%   19.91%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    20200    20198       -2     
============================================
  Files          6373     6373              
  Lines        577230   577230              
  Branches      70696    70696              
============================================
- Hits         114958   114943      -15     
- Misses       449703   449722      +19     
+ Partials      12569    12565       -4     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.71% <ø> (ø)
unittests 21.18% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔴 Test Coverage Grade: D — Marginal

Metric Value
Line coverage 24.82%
Branch coverage 19.04%

Grade Scale

Grade Line Coverage Meaning
🟢 A ≥ 80% Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴
🟡 B 60-79% Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉
🟠 C 40-59% Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬
🔴 D 20-39% Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖
⛔ F < 20% Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥

Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run

@weizhouapache

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 19046

@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@weizhouapache

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@andrijapanicsb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ACSHomeBot package

@ACSHomeBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Accepted: package kvm for 4f1f33b437ed.

Planned: RPM + DEB, KVM SystemVM.

Status: Queued for worker A. Jobs ahead: 0.

@apache apache deleted a comment from ACSHomeBot Sep 1, 2026
@ACSHomeBot

ACSHomeBot commented Sep 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging results:

Result Artifact Platform
PASS RPM EL (EL8/9/10)
PASS DEB Ubuntu, Debian

Test packages are available at:

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-16869)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 56831 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr14028-t16869-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 154 look OK, 2 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
ContextSuite context=TestClusterDRS>:setup Error 0.00 test_cluster_drs.py
test_1_userdata_on_ssvm Failure 133.08 test_systemvm_userdata.py

@shwstppr

shwstppr commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 19066

@nvazquez

nvazquez commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 19131

@nvazquez

nvazquez commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blueorangutan test matrix

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nvazquez a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8, ubuntu22 mgmt + kvm-ubuntu22, ol8 mgmt + vmware-70u3, ol9 mgmt + xcpng82) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-16954)

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-16956)

@sureshanaparti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 19200

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-16953)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 65633 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr14028-t16953-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 156 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File

@weizhouapache

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 19445

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants