[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
jdx/mise-action	action	patch	v5.2.2 → v5.2.6

---

Release Notes

jdx/mise-action

v5.2.6: : Fix step hanging after a failed cache restore

Compare Source

The action now exits as soon as its work is done. Before this release, a cache restore that failed during the download could leave the step running for up to ten minutes after setup had finished.

Fixed

• A failed cache restore no longer leaves the step hanging. If the mise cache download failed partway through, for example with getaddrinfo EAI_AGAIN, the action logged a warning, installed the tools and saved the cache, then stopped producing output. The step stayed in progress until the job was cancelled or a timer inside @actions/cache fired after 10 minutes. That timer is left running when a download fails (actions/toolkit#2470), and it kept the Node process alive. The action now exits explicitly after both the main step and the post step finish. It waits up to 5 seconds for log output to flush, then exits. The exit code set by any earlier failure is kept. Errors that aren't Error objects now mark the step as failed with their message. Before, they caused an unhandled rejection. (#​718 by @​jdx and @​kjanat, fixes #​717)

Full Changelog: jdx/mise-action@v5.2.5...v5.2.6

v5.2.5: : Bundled packslip verifier updated to 1.11.0; README examples use v5

Compare Source

This release updates the packslip library that the action uses to verify downloaded mise releases, and updates the README examples to use the current major versions.

Changed

• packslip updated from 1.8.0 to 1.11.0. The action uses packslip to check a downloaded mise binary against the signed packslip.sigstore.json that ships with mise releases from 2026.9.3 onward. The new version runs extra checks on the signed statement: the identity it declares must match the certificate that signed it, and the certificate must belong to the github.com/jdx/mise repository. GitHub and GitLab repository names now match regardless of letter case. The action still asks for the same identity, issuer and tag as before, and there are no new inputs. (#​715)
• The README examples now use jdx/mise-action@v5 and actions/checkout@v7. (#​710 by @​deining)

Full Changelog: jdx/mise-action@v5.2.4...v5.2.5

v5.2.4: : Reuse cached signed checksums when restoring mise

Compare Source

Jobs that restore mise from the cache no longer have to download its signed checksums from GitHub on every run, so a network failure at that step no longer fails a job that otherwise restored correctly.

Fixed

• Restoring a cached mise no longer needs a network download of the checksums. The action checks the cached mise binary against the signed SHASUMS256.txt and its .minisig. Before this release it downloaded both files from GitHub on every run, even when the cache restored correctly. When that download failed, for example after repeated curl errors, the job failed. Now, once the signature checks out, the action saves both files as SHASUMS256-<version>.txt and .minisig in <mise_dir>/bin, which is part of the mise cache. On later runs it reads them from the restored cache and checks the minisign signature again before using them. If the files are missing, corrupt or tampered with, the action downloads them as it did before. There are no new inputs. (#​708 by @​jdx)
  • Caches saved by earlier versions don't contain these files. The main cache is only saved on a cache miss, so runs keep downloading the checksums until the cache is saved again or its key changes.

Full Changelog: jdx/mise-action@v5.2.3...v5.2.4

v5.2.3: : Faster cache key computation in large workspaces

Compare Source

The cache key no longer comes from searching the whole workspace for mise config files. In repos that already contain node_modules or vendor/bundle, this removes a delay of several minutes in "Restoring mise cache".

Fixed

• "Restoring mise cache" no longer takes minutes after installing dependencies. To build the cache key, the action used to match about 25 **/… glob patterns. That meant it walked every subdirectory of the workspace, including node_modules and vendor/bundle, before checking the cache at all. When the action ran after a step like pnpm install or ruby/setup-ruby with bundler-cache: true, this could take 3–7 minutes. The action now looks for mise config files the same way mise does: only in the working directory and each parent directory up to the workspace root. It checks for mise.toml, .mise.toml, .config/mise/…, conf.d fragments, .tool-versions, and their local, env-specific and .lock variants. The step also logs Hashed mise config files in N.Ns. (#​703 by @​jdx and @​corsicanec82)
  • If you set a custom cache_key that doesn't use {{file_hash}} or {{default}}, the action no longer hashes config files at all.
  • Config files in subdirectories, such as monorepo sub-projects, no longer affect the cache key. mise only loads them with --monorepo.
  • Cache keys change, so the first run after you upgrade will miss the cache.

New Contributors

• @​corsicanec82 made their first contribution in 91e7f82 (#​703)

Full Changelog: jdx/mise-action@v5.2.2...v5.2.3

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • At any time (no schedule defined)
• Automerge
  • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 66%. Comparing base (892394c) to head (1db2944).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           main   #1763     +/-   ##
======================================
+ Coverage    39%     66%    +26%     
======================================
  Files        22      23      +1     
  Lines      2075    3565   +1490     
======================================
+ Hits        825    2355   +1530     
+ Misses     1250    1210     -40     

Flag	Coverage Δ
examples	39% <ø> (ø)
tests	65% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.