Skip to content

chore(deps): update github/codeql-action action to v4.39.0 - #845

Merged
vil02 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/github-codeql-action-4.x
Oct 17, 2026
Merged

vil02 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/github-codeql-action-4.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
github/codeql-action action minor v4.38.2 → v4.39.0

Release Notes

github/codeql-action

v4.39.0

Compare Source

  • Breaking change: Bump the minimum required CodeQL bundle version to 2.20.7. #​4205
  • The codeql-action/analyze step now validates that a correct argument for the checkout_path input has been provided. The checkout_path input must be set to the path where the repository that is being analyzed is checked out at on the runner, if that path is something other than the workspace root. If the path does not point to a repository checkout or is different from the path that was used by codeql-action/init, then the CodeQL Action now produces a warning. #​4148
  • Resolved an issue with third-party caching implementations that prevented caches from being restored correctly. #​4206
  • The codeql-action/start-proxy step that is used in Code Scanning Default Setup now finds CodeQL releases using the same logic as codeql-action/init. This primarily benefits customers who are using GitHub instances other than github.com where the codeql-action/start-proxy step may previously have been unable to locate recent releases and ended up using outdated versions of the private registry authentication proxy as a result. #​4198

v4.38.3

Compare Source

  • Upcoming breaking change: CodeQL version 2.21.2 and earlier were discontinued on 24 September 2026 alongside GitHub Enterprise Server 3.17, and will be unsupported by the next minor release of the CodeQL Action. Added a deprecation warning for customers using these versions of CodeQL. #​4188
  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.27.2. #​4203
  • Fixed a bug where the decision of whether to use a per-language bundle did not account for custom configurations that reference queries outside of compiled CodeQL packs. This issue was caught during internal testing and did not affect any customer repositories. We will resume the roll out of per-language bundles in the coming weeks. #​4184

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codacy-production

codacy-production Bot commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage ∅ diff coverage · +0.00% coverage variation

Metric Results
Coverage variation ✅ +0.00% coverage variation
Diff coverage ✅ ∅ diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (1b54fe0) 559 559 100.00%
Head commit (7422b75) 559 (+0) 559 (+0) 100.00% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#845) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (1b54fe0) to head (7422b75).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #845   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines          559       559           
  Branches        41        41           
=========================================
  Hits           559       559           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/github-codeql-action-4.x branch 3 times, most recently from ac17220 to e4dcb82 Compare October 13, 2026 07:33
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update github/codeql-action action to v4.38.3 chore(deps): update github/codeql-action action to v4.39.0 Oct 15, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/github-codeql-action-4.x branch from e4dcb82 to 10a5802 Compare October 15, 2026 16:43
@vil02
vil02 enabled auto-merge (squash) October 17, 2026 10:43
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/github-codeql-action-4.x branch from 10a5802 to 4a1efcd Compare October 17, 2026 10:43
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/github-codeql-action-4.x branch from 4a1efcd to 7422b75 Compare October 17, 2026 11:00
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@vil02
vil02 merged commit 57ecc2a into master Oct 17, 2026
17 checks passed
@renovate
renovate Bot deleted the renovate/github-codeql-action-4.x branch October 17, 2026 11:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant