Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency pytest-mock to v3.17.0 - #856

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/pytest-mock-3.x
Open

renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/pytest-mock-3.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
pytest-mock (changelog) 3.16.0 → 3.17.0 age confidence

Release Notes

pytest-dev/pytest-mock (pytest-mock)

v3.17.0

Compare Source

2026-10-17

  • #&#8203;641 <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/641>_: Failures of mock assertions such as assert_called_with are again reported only once, instead of two or three times with the original error from the mock module chained before them.
  • #&#8203;642 <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/642>_: Mock assertion failures no longer show misleading introspection when they are not about the arguments of the last call: assert_called, assert_called_once, assert_not_called, assert_any_call, their await counterparts, and assert_called_once_with/assert_awaited_once_with when the mock was not called (awaited) exactly once. The introspection also no longer reports arguments passed by position versus by keyword as different for autospecced mocks, and no longer shows empty Args:/Kwargs: sections when assertion rewriting is not available.
  • #&#8203;643 <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/643>_: assert_has_calls and assert_has_awaits failures no longer show pytest introspection, which compared the expected and actual calls position by position and so reported differences between unrelated calls. The mock's own message, listing the expected and actual calls, is still shown.

v3.16.1

Compare Source

2026-10-17

  • #&#8203;617 <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/617>_: Fixed assert_has_calls raising ValueError instead of AssertionError (or showing misleading introspection) when the expected calls are plain tuples rather than call(...) objects, such as (args, kwargs) entries of another mock's call_args_list, (args,), (kwargs,), (name, args) or (name, kwargs).
  • #&#8203;621 <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/621>_: Fixed mocker.stop() sometimes stopping the wrong mock, for example with mocks from mocker.create_autospec.
  • #&#8203;621 <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/621>_: mocker.stop() now undoes the most recent patch first when the same object is used in several patches.
  • #&#8203;623 <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/623>_: Fixed misleading introspection in assert_has_awaits failures, and assert_has_calls/assert_has_awaits raising IndexError instead of AssertionError when calls is passed by keyword.
  • #&#8203;624 <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/624>_: Clear spy_return_iter after a spied synchronous or asynchronous function raises, matching spy_return.
  • #&#8203;627 <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/627>_: Document async_stub await assertions and the distinction between call and await tracking.
  • #&#8203;629 <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/629>_: Fixed mocker.resetall() skipping the mocks patched with mocker.patch.multiple(), both the ones it creates and the ones passed explicitly.
  • #&#8203;630 <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/630>_: mocker.resetall() now also resets spy_return and spy_exception of spies, like it already did for spy_return_list and spy_return_iter, and no longer overwrites attributes with these names on mocks that are not spies.
  • #&#8203;633 <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/633>_: Fixed spies on classmethod, staticmethod, builtins and classes returning a MagicMock instead of calling the spied code after mocker.resetall(side_effect=True). Resetting a spy's side_effect now goes back to calling the spied code, also clearing any side_effect set on the spy.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codacy-production

codacy-production Bot commented Oct 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage ∅ diff coverage · +0.00% coverage variation

Metric Results
Coverage variation ✅ +0.00% coverage variation
Diff coverage ✅ ∅ diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (94235af) 559 559 100.00%
Head commit (9df1d3c) 559 (+0) 559 (+0) 100.00% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#856) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (94235af) to head (9df1d3c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #856   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines          559       559           
  Branches        41        41           
=========================================
  Hits           559       559           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants