Skip to content

chore(main): release 10.5.0 - #559

Open
workos-sdk-automation[bot] wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
release-please--branches--main--components--workos
Open

workos-sdk-automation[bot] wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
release-please--branches--main--components--workos

Conversation

@workos-sdk-automation

@workos-sdk-automation workos-sdk-automation Bot commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

10.5.0 (2026-10-15)

Features

  • admin_portal: SDK surface change: AdminPortal.create_revoke_link was renamed to AdminPortal.revoke_link (#565) (b3d8713)
  • admin_portal: Update admin portal API surface (#562) (30f8794)
  • audit_logs: Update audit log API surface (#562) (30f8794)
  • authorization: Update authorization API surface (#562) (30f8794)
  • feature_flags: Update feature flag API surface (#562) (30f8794)
  • generated: Authorization (batch c64ce1e7) (#558) (db38c4b)
  • organizations: Update organization API surface (#562) (30f8794)
  • pipes: Change Pipes API surface (#562) (30f8794)
  • pipes: Update Pipes API surface (#562) (30f8794)
  • radar: Update radar API surface (#562) (30f8794)
  • user_management: Update user management API surface (#562) (30f8794)
  • user_management: Update user management API surface (#565) (b3d8713)

Bug Fixes

  • user_management: Change errors for endpoint POST /user_management/authenticate (#565) (b3d8713)

This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

RetriggerView in GreptileConfidence Score: 5/5

[Medium impact] The PR appears safe to merge, though the release notes should disclose the Admin Portal method rename.

Findings

  1. P2 Admin Portal rename omitted ▶
  2. P2 Contradictory Pipes release notes ▶
Fix with agent prompt
### Issue 1
CHANGELOG.md:199
The new 10.5.0 notes list only three user-management changes for #565. That change also renames `AdminPortal#create_revoke_link` to `AdminPortal#revoke_link` without keeping the old method. Customers relying on these notes will not know that existing calls raise `NoMethodError` after upgrading. Please document the rename as a breaking change.

### Issue 2
CHANGELOG.md:16-19
The 10.5.0 entry says these two models and their enums were removed, but later lists the same names as added. Neither model appears in the 10.4.0 release or the current SDK. This makes it harder for customers to tell what changed or whether they need to migrate.

---

For each issue above, determine whether it is valid and should be fixed. If so, fix it directly.

Summary

The PR prepares the 10.5.0 release by updating version metadata, moving pending entries into the changelog, and updating the lockfile.

Reviews (3) · Last reviewed commit: "chore: update Gemfile.lock" · Reviewed by Greptile

@workos-sdk-automation
workos-sdk-automation Bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--workos branch from bcaf1f5 to 9ed1114 Compare October 15, 2026 12:19
Comment thread CHANGELOG.md
Comment on lines +16 to +19
* Removed model `AddDataIntegrationsUpsertApiKeyRequest`
* Removed model `AddDataIntegrationsUpsertClientCredentialsRequest`
* Removed enum `AddDataIntegrationsUpsertApiKeyRequestConnectionOwner`
* Removed enum `AddDataIntegrationsUpsertClientCredentialsRequestConnectionOwner`

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Contradictory Pipes release notes The 10.5.0 entry says these two models and their enums were removed, but later lists the same names as added. Neither model appears in the 10.4.0 release or the current SDK. This makes it harder for customers to tell what changed or whether they need to migrate.

Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: CHANGELOG.md
Line: 16-19

Comment:
**Contradictory Pipes release notes** The 10.5.0 entry says these two models and their enums were removed, but later lists the same names as added. Neither model appears in the 10.4.0 release or the current SDK. This makes it harder for customers to tell what changed or whether they need to migrate.

---

For each issue above, determine whether it is valid and should be fixed. If so, fix it directly.

@workos-sdk-automation
workos-sdk-automation Bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--workos branch from 7b189d0 to e78c2db Compare October 15, 2026 16:20
Comment thread CHANGELOG.md
* Changed errors for endpoint `POST /connections`
* Changed errors for endpoint `POST /connections/{connectionId}/saml_sp_signing_cert`

* [#565](https://github.com/workos/workos-ruby/pull/565) feat(generated)!: regenerate from spec (3 changes)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Admin Portal rename omitted The new 10.5.0 notes list only three user-management changes for #565. That change also renames AdminPortal#create_revoke_link to AdminPortal#revoke_link without keeping the old method. Customers relying on these notes will not know that existing calls raise NoMethodError after upgrading. Please document the rename as a breaking change.

Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: CHANGELOG.md
Line: 199

Comment:
**Admin Portal rename omitted** The new 10.5.0 notes list only three user-management changes for #565. That change also renames `AdminPortal#create_revoke_link` to `AdminPortal#revoke_link` without keeping the old method. Customers relying on these notes will not know that existing calls raise `NoMethodError` after upgrading. Please document the rename as a breaking change.

---

For each issue above, determine whether it is valid and should be fixed. If so, fix it directly.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants